The EC model contract establishes various rights and obligations for
contractors in FP6 projects. When contractors do not comply with these
obligations, the Commission might claim a breach of contract.
If the Commission claims an infringement of contractual obligations,
the applicable law for sanctions is determined by the choice of law clause of
the contract. EC contracts designate Belgian or Luxembourg law as governing the
contract (please see article 12 of the
core
contract). Contractors should check their contract with the
Commission to identify the law applicable in their case.
The following is meant to give an overview on the sanctions foreseen
by the underlying EC provisions
.
The European Commission will check any breach of obligations
deriving from the EC contract, inter alia any "irregularity". An irregularity
is
any infringement of a provision of Community law or
any breach of a contractual obligation resulting from an act or omission by a
contractor which has, or would have, the effect of prejudicing the general
budget of the European Communities or budgets managed by it through unjustified
expenditure (article II.1.11
Annex
II to the EC model contract)
Moreover, it will take action if a contractor violates fundamental
ethical principles as referred to in the
Rules
for Participation.
In any of these cases, the Commission has the right to terminate the
participation of the contractor
concerned; If the consortium cannot provide
satisfactory alternative solutions to make up for its breach, the Commission
shall terminate the project. This option also includes the possibility of
excluding the defaulting party from all other contracts it has entered into
with the Commission. If contracts have not yet been signed, the defaulting
contractor may be excluded from the evaluation or selection procedure.
The consequences of such exclusions are mainly financial:
In the event of terminations, and if the defaulting contractor has
unduly received funds, the Commission will issue a recovery order requiring the
defaulting contractor to reimburse the amount of Community contributions or ask
it to transfer the amount due to the consortium. Details on the procedure are
set out in the
Financial
Guidelines, Section 5.1.
To safeguard the Commission's financial interests, the contract
provides for the possibility of collective financial responsibility within the
consortium: If the defaulting contractor does not fulfil his obligation to
reimburse the amount due to the Commission and is not a public body,
international organisation or a contractor whose participation is guaranteed by
a Member State or Associated State, the consortium may be obliged to pay the
amount as a last option to recover the outstanding debt
.
Additionally, the provisions provide for the possibility of claiming
liquidated damages from a contractor who has received an unjustified financial
contribution from the Commission due to overstatement of expenditures.
Penalties are regularly determined as a certain percentage of the
overstatement. The principle of collective responsibility of the consortium
does not apply in the case of liquidated damages.
Penalties can, moreover, be imposed in the event of a grave breach
of contractual obligations or irregularities (e.g. failure to complete an
audit) or upon contractors who have been found guilty of false declarations.
Such penalties generally amount to 2% to 10% of the value of the financial
contribution received from the Community by the defaulting contractor. In event
of a repeated breach, the rate may rise to 4% to 20%.
The means of reimbursement, liquidated damages and financial
penalties are also provided for in any other cases of overstated expenses, for
example following regular audits, without necessarily involving the
termination/exclusion of the contractor.
Apart from the above-mentioned sanctions, the Commission is entitled
to apply further administrative or financial sanctions complying with the
Financial Regulations with regard to defaulting contractors. Use might also be
made of other civil remedies by the Community and/or other contractors of the
project. Again, their implementation will be determined by the law applicable
to the contract. Finally, contractors might face criminal proceedings brought
by the authorities of Member States (for offences such as fraud, grave
professional misconduct, corruption or other illegal activity) where
legitimate.