Previous Issues:
 
32
March - April
2007
31
January - February
2007
30
November - December
2006
29
September - October
2006
28
July - August
2006
27
May - June
2006
26
March - April
2006
25
January - February
2006
24
November - December
2005
23
September - October
2005
22
July - August
2005
21
May - June
2005
20
March - April
2005
19
January - February
2005
IPR-Helpdesk Bulletin
2002 - 2004
 
 
  N. 33, May - June 2007 

Editorial 

Ensuring fair trade in ideas


Peter Mandelson
EU Commissioner for Trade

 
One of the reasons Europe has maintained its global market share over the last decade is the ability of EU companies to sell products at premium price. Innovation, invention and creativity are the added value. That’s our comparative advantage. It lies behind every European premium innovative product, whether it’s a fashion shoe, a solar panel using new environmental technology, a semiconductor or even Champagne.

But, every day – at a rate for which the only certainty is that it is rising every year – those ideas are being stolen.

Twenty years ago, counterfeiting might have been regarded as a problem chiefly for the makers of expensive handbags. Most people’s exposure to counterfeiting was a cheap polo shirt or a "Gucci" watch that probably stopped by the time they got home.

But this is no longer only about clothes and watches. The man selling the Lacoste t-shirt is now part of a multi-billion dollar black economy with a suitcase full of fake foodstuffs and drinks, fake car parts, fake airplane parts, electrical appliances and toys. This suitcase grown by 1000% in the last ten years, and its contents are far more dangerous.

In 2004, 800,000 doses of fake medicine were seized at EU borders. Most of those fake drugs were headed for the world’s poorest countries.

So what are we doing about it? Over the last year, the Commission conducted an extensive consultation with EU businesses to get a sense of where the problem is focussed and where we need to focus our activities.

It confirmed what we pretty much knew already, which is that about two thirds of counterfeit goods intercepted on their way into the EU are made in China. We have also identified Russia, the Ukraine, Turkey, several ASEAN and Mercosur countries, and Chile as priorities.

Some of these countries have made commitments to the EU to improve protection of IPR. Many of them are fully aware of the problem, and we’re working with them. But we will push harder where necessary to get commitments fulfilled and rules enforced, including the possibility of exercising the right to seek redress through the WTO.

We’ve teamed up with the U.S. this year to create joint task forces in our offices overseas, and to have customs services work together.

We’ve been strengthening our resources in some of these countries to help EU businesses find reliable suppliers, spot the risks of IP theft and deal with the domestic authorities. In China, Russia and the Ukraine we have implemented mechanisms between right holders and the competent enforcement authorities so problems can be addressed directly.

We’ve also been co-operating with governments in China, ASEAN and the Balkans, providing technical assistance and pursuing joint efforts to improve protection on the ground.

Europe is facing stiffer global competition than ever before. We’re right to accept the comparative advantages of the emerging economies in labour and production costs – that is tough competition, but it is fair competition. But Europe can also ask that its own comparative advantages – and the rules countries have agreed to – are respected in turn. The trade in ideas – like any other trade – must be fair trade.