Previous Issues:
 
34
July - August
2007
33
May - June
2007
32
March - April
2007
31
January - February
2007
30
November - December
2006
29
September - October
2006
28
July - August
2006
27
May - June
2006
26
March - April
2006
25
January - February
2006
24
November - December
2005
23
September - October
2005
22
July - August
2005
21
May - June
2005
20
March - April
2005
19
January - February
2005
IPR-Helpdesk Bulletin
2002 - 2004
 
 
  N. 35, September - October 2007 

IP in practice 
Best practices  
 

The hidden technology

Simone Maccagnan
Sales Manager / Researcher


In approximately 25 years, Gimac, the enterprise started by Giorgio Maccagnan and Marina Scremin has been able to transversally revolutionise sectors like Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices. Moreover, it has become the 4th largest contributor in terms of intellectual property in the Province of Varese, which is a 20th century cradle of aerospace, motorcycle and chemical technologies.

Gimac produces machinery and turn-key systems to obtain tubes, filaments and membranes from unstable, expensive or self-synthesized materials in the form of blends of polymers, drugs, nanoparticles or ceramic powders.



Thanks to Gimac’s technology, microinvasive surgery, tissue engineering and drug eluting implantable devices can be “equipped with” complex and very small components for critical applications.

Just as, when pointing the moon, you attract the attention mainly to your finger, the real technology is “hidden” behind its results.

Imagine that we need to bring a camera, a scalpel, a water jet, the air for inflating a balloon and an electrode, in short a whole “micro-surgery” room, through a blood vessel that is a few millimeters wide.

We all know that nowadays this is possible, but how?

This is generally unknown, paradoxically what makes the impossible possible stays behind the curtains.

If somebody shows us a tube smaller than a toothpick, we perceive it as high technology, but is it really the technology?



That which we normally find on the surgeon’s trolley, aside from the surgeon himself, has been “simply” condensed in a very small tube - a catheter.

This may be new, but is it also an invention? What if I said the catheter is something irrational made possible by advanced technology?

So… where is the technology? Or it may be better to ask: What is the technique? In general, I would say that it is what allows the transformation of a raw material or a product into another one.

And what is the technology? In the above-mentioned case, part of the technology that makes possible the miniaturisation is called “microextrusion”, but we can define the technology as a derivative of a simple thought: “let’s pretend for a second not to think that our problem cannot be solved, and on the basis of the techniques we know (all the techniques, including the fancier and unrelated ones) let’s try to find a solution for it”.

This was Einstein’s attitude when he uttered a beautiful sentence that every entrepreneur, researcher, politician, every farmer or dreamer should have in mind or on the wall of a restroom. Einstein said: “something is considered impossible until somebody that does not know about it arrives and invents it”.

The invention… what is an invention? An invention is a distraction, and forgetfulness is in fact a way of inventing. It’s simple, you say to your brain, “This is the problem for which you need to find a solution.” Then, when you find one, you write it down, you dismiss it, and again you tell your brain, “now choose different techniques, different physical laws, forget about the previous approach, and think about a totally different solution, a new one”, a new mental process, an invention, a patent?

Is the patent interesting for the inventor? Clearly, the inventor is interested in continuing to invent in order to demonstrate the value of his invention and to use the resources from it.



Certainly the patent is interesting for the registrant, and even more for the one who will use it.

The patent is clearly interesting for the demanding, modern and merciless sponsors and, since I am an entrepreneur, it is interesting for me.

An entrepreneur is his own sponsor - this is Gimac’s concept - to be your own sponsor, to look for stimuli, follow them, support them, invent, change paths, reinvent or invent something new, and decide whether to patent it.

Follow the new complexity, face it, solve problems, come up with new ideas and wait for somebody to need what you have created. But until this moment, patenting does not make much sense, unless there is a fear that somebody else might “re-invent” and patent the invention first, thus “forbidding” the inventor to use and develop his own idea. This is a dilemma, a kind of “blackmail”… You can apply for a patent immediately, thus publicly revealing your idea, which you don’t consider mature enough to propose to the market or, because of the way the legal system works, you may loose the right to follow up on your idea.

Reveal? Patent? Progress feeds itself with the sons of inventors (the inventions) for the good of the economy, and that is why it desires more inventions. It compels inventors to give away their newborn babies, much as in ancient Sparta children were taken from their mums to be transformed into brave warriors. Unfortunately this is civilisation and the law on IP of today.

However, there is another way to approach the violent and predatory universe of inventions. This alternative is especially effective for young entrepreneurs.

For a young entrepreneur, it is important to understand the basics of the bureaucracy around IP, but it is even more important to find a good administrator, together with whom it will be possible to manage the commercial results of the invention. Trying to personally administrate the commercial results of one’s own ideas will make the act of inventing more and more difficult since it will be more and more difficult to admit that there may be alternatives to your invention. So if the invention goes its “own way” - let it be!

No one should ever stop inventing out of a fear of losing ownership, or he will loose the gift, the ability to invent.

It is necessary to remember that there will always be a newer, better solution. But the important thing is to invent it first, preferably not before the market needs it, but as soon as the administrator feels that the right moment has arrived.

But we should never try to keep all inventions to ourselves. We should choose some of them, choose a delegate to exploit them, but never try to manage them all by yourself or you will become their slave.

www.gimac.com

simone@gimac.com