| |
 |
N. 37, January - March 2008
|
|
|
 | IP & RTD: Articles
 |
|
|
|
Utility Model: short SMEs overview
Matteo Piccini
Senior Manager
Grado Zero Espace Srl
|
|
|
The constant increase in the number of SMEs accessing the research
world for the first time, particularly in connection with the Framework
Programs of the European Community, has caused an increase in the volume of
technical information exchanged between companies operating in totally
different sectors. This has often provided a chance to modify and/or adapt
particular pre-existing productive processes to fields in which, until that
moment, they had not found any application. In this way, they give rise to new
and previously untried productive methodologies.
Clearly, in this case, the necessity of effectively safeguarding
one's discoveries is particularly important. Consequently, companies tend
toward patent-like coverage while forgetting that, in most cases, it would
probably be better to use another tool that is still not very widespread, the
so-called “utility model”.
Aside from all the technical reflections and remarks related to the
registration of a utility model, it is useful to note the three most obvious
differences from a patent:
- The Utility Model is intended to provide particular efficiency
or convenience when applied to machines or their parts, instruments, tools or
general items. This is a clear distinction, at least on the theoretical level,
from patents, which require aspects of absolute originality and novelty for
products or processes. It will essentially be possible, and in some cases
compulsory, to use the utility model for an innovation obtained through the
reuse (with suitable adjustment) – in new and different sectors and with
different purposes – of already existing products and processes.
- Filing and registration fees for utility models are usually
lower, sometimes as much as 50% lower than the charge for a patent
registration. It is also necessary to consider the costs of necessary, or at
least recommended, consulting by professionals in the intellectual and
industrial property safeguard sector. Such fees are drastically lower with the
utility model because the procedure is not very complex.
- The duration of the protection provided by the utility model,
and therefore the duration of the so-called “monopoly right”, is
10 years (in some countries it may have a shorter term), while that of a patent
is 20 years. Though this may initially be considered a limitation, it is useful
to consider that, considering the current speed of growth and innovation of
industrial processes, the utility model is often adequate to safeguard the
exclusive exploitation of one's “invention” until the market,
more or less lawfully, achieves another product or process that replaces
it.
A basic analysis of these comments shows that the utility model is
currently underestimated as compared to the patent, particularly for SMEs,
which usually need to seriously consider the cost/profit ratio. With limited
economic effort, it is possible to achieve adequate results that can assure a
sufficient “monopoly right” for a consistent return on the
investment.
Clearly, there are some arguments against using the utility model.
The first is undoubtedly the absence of harmonised national laws for this type
of protection at the European level. In 1997, a foundation was created to issue
a Directive for this purpose, but the it seems to have faded away in
2005.
Currently, it is necessary to submit utility model registration
applications in every country where protection is sought. This could be an
obstacle (although it can be overcome with the help of professionals with
experience in this sector and an adequate capillary network). In anticipation
of harmonisation of the legislation at the Community level, it is therfore
advisable to carry out a preliminary analysis that, after the identification of
the geographical areas of interest, adequately compares the required investment
with the concrete needs of the company applying.
In sum, without any prejudice or any aprioristic thought about the
utility model, the use of the utility model can provide companies, especially
SMEs, with a good way for to get results and, at the same time, to avoid many
expenses. Thus, in the event the product or process is not well received by the
market, there is much less loss because less time and money has been
invested.
|
| |
|
|