| |
 |
N. 41, January - March 2009
|
|
|
 | Editorial
 |
|
|
|
IP in business: the tale of the three big
questions
Jeremy Phillips
Professorial Fellow, QMIPRI
Intellectual Property Consultant, Olswang
|
|
|
For 150 years, from the birth of mass-manufactured consumer goods in
the 1850s until the dot.com crunch at the beginning of the current millennium,
the main focus on intellectual property has been market-based. In jurisdictions
rich and poor, industrialised and agrarian the three big questions asked by
businesses are the same: (i) how do I stop other people copying me, (ii) how
can I sell others the right to copy me and (iii) how can I make sure that other
people can’t stop me in the meantime?
How different are things now. Only a few short years into the 2000s
businesses still ask three questions—but increasingly they are different
ones: (i) can I afford IP protection, (ii) how can I finance my business
activities and (iii) where and how can I borrow what I need in order to run my
business? Let us look at each of these in turn.
The cost of IP protection is
important, particularly for small businesses, since money spent on acquiring IP
rights is often seen as “dead”. Most patents are never infringed;
nor are most trade marks and designs, and the cost of obtaining them is seen as
a write-off. More than one innovating business has observed with sadness that
the banks, the accountants, the patent attorneys and the other professionals
hired to help launch a new project get paid whether that project succeeds or
not. It’s only the innovator—who pays them—who will only
see a return on his venture if it succeeds. So cost must be kept down, and it
must be viewed as an investment in its own right rather than as an expensive
insurance policy against a risk that may never happen.
The financing of business
activities is important too, and here the role of IP is flexible.
Its existence can make a financier feel comfortable to lend money to a
business, or it can induce others to make their own investments at their own
risk. Why borrow vast sums to set up a chain of burger bars if, by registering
the trade mark and licensing it together with a business format, you can induce
hundreds of licensees to borrow for you, giving you royalties for the use of
your mark?
The sourcing of funds is
difficult too. There is much truth in the statement that banks only want to
lend to those who don’t need the money, but IP rights are valuable
assets which can be securitised, placed on a business balance sheet to enhance
its apparent value, or used as bait when fishing for funds through a share
issue or initial market placement.
A glance at the world’s IP legislation shows that there are
no old answers for the three new questions. Nor do WIPO treaties and agreements
provide much support. But now that WIPO has convened its first IP-and-finance
meeting we may be confident that this subject has at least reached the
world’s IP agenda.
Jeremy Phillips administers or participates
in the administration of several IP blogs including the
IPKat
blog,
IP
Tango (IP in Latin America),
PatLit (Patent Litigation weblog) and
IP
Finance.
|
| |
|
|